Year 3 starts under gubernatorial edict
Last updated 3/29/2022 at 11:06am
Sorry to break the news, Washingtonians, but Year 3 of living under emergency orders by the governor will continue without meaningful legislative oversight.
The House officially killed Senate Bill 5909 before adjourning. Although that bill as passed by the Senate was essentially fake reform, several amendments were introduced for the House floor debate to bring the policy back in line with what exists in the rest of the country by requiring affirmative legislative approval for emergency orders after a set period in time.
Shockingly the House floor debate started around 1 a.m. March 4. It only lasted for approximately 30 minutes until debate was suddenly ended before even voting on the amendments. House Democratic leadership never brought the bill back to the floor.
One House Democrat tweeted emergency powers reform died because of a Republican “filibuster,” — a very odd explanation considering there is no filibuster power in Washington state. Perhaps this lawmaker was surprised that after two years of being denied the opportunity to debate emergency powers reform, supporters of real legislative oversight would want to speak to proposed amendments, even if the debate was brought to the floor by Democratic leadership after 1 a.m. in the morning.
Rep. Chris Corry, the prime sponsor of the bipartisan House Bill 1772 emergency powers bill, told me:
“I was disappointed that 1772 was not moved out of committee. My hope was we could take 5909 and improve the bill. I offered an amendment on the floor to add a requirement for the legislature to modify, end or extend a state of emergency after 60 days and align legislature approval of prohibiting activities with their current authority on approval of statute waivers. It is important that people have a say in ongoing states of emergency. This isn’t about the current emergency orders. It is about addressing an imbalance in our state’s governance. Unfortunately, after only 30 minutes of discussion, the democrats pulled the bill.”
Having monitored the emergency powers debate across the country for the last few years, I remain dumbfounded why Washington’s legislative majority is content to cede its constitutional role to the governor.
Other legislatures, even those controlled by the same party as their governor, worked to improve the balance of power in their states. Sadly, that same level of institutional protection of the legislative power and duty continues to be AWOL in Washington.
Harmonizing the existing law so that both waiving of statute and restrictive proclamations expire after 30 days unless the Legislature votes to continue should not be controversial.
Requiring affirmative legislative approval after a set point in time removes not a single tool from the governor’s toolbox. All existing authority remains, the only change is that the closed-door policy making is required to be justified to the people’s legislative branch.
The governor should not fear being required to make the case to lawmakers and the Legislature should not hide from its constitutional responsibility.
With the Legislature failing to adopt emergency powers reform, we will now continue to hold our breath each time the governor calls a press conference. Hopefully, those lawmakers coming to Olympia in 2023 will have a stronger appetite for ensuring checks and balances and separations of power.
– Jason Mercier is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center. Email him at [email protected]